Skip to main content

I. The Structural Problem

Why Every "Disruptor" Becomes What It Opposed​

The pattern repeats:

LendingClub (2006): "Peer-to-peer lending eliminates banks!"

  • Today: Is a bank. Personal loan APRs: 8.05-35.99%

Upstart (2012): "AI democratizes credit!"

  • Today: Public company. Personal loan APRs: 6.4-35.99%

SoFi (2011): "Member benefits, not profit!"

  • Today: Public company. Personal loan APRs: 8.99-29.99%

These aren't execution failures. The structure forces extraction.

The Impossible Trinity​

Traditional fintech cannot have all three:

  1. VC funding (requires 10x returns)
  2. Fair pricing (low APRs to customers)
  3. Sustainable business (profitable unit economics)

The traditional path:

Raise VC → Need 10x return → IPO → Quarterly earnings pressure
→ Maximize revenue (increase APRs) → Become extractive

Where Your Interest Actually Goes​

Average credit card APR: 24.8% (Q2 2024, Federal Reserve data)

Conservative breakdown of what that includes:

Cost of capital:        4-6%   (what banks pay to borrow)
Default risk:           3-5%   (expected losses)
Operations:             2-4%   (processing, servicing, fraud)
Regulatory/Capital:     2-3%   (reserves, compliance)
                        ─────
Base cost:              11-18%

Everything above this is margin/overhead:
Marketing/Acquisition:  2-4%
Rewards programs:       1-2%
Profit margins:         3-7%
                        ─────
Additional:             6-13%

Your APR:               ~24.8%

The question: How much of that 6-13% is necessary vs extractive?

That's where the opportunity lies. Not in eliminating all profit, but in:

  • Removing expensive customer acquisition (viral product)
  • Removing shareholder return pressure (community ownership)
  • Removing opacity premium (transparent pricing)

Estimated addressable inefficiency: $30-50B annually across US consumer credit market.